Legal Opinion

Fernando v. Nieswandt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 28, 1997No. 37960-7-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

Bernhild Nieswandt and Jim Fernando separated about eight months after their child, A., was born. Nieswandt moved from their LaConner home to her parents’ home in Portland. Fernando brought a paternity and custody suit to secure his visitation rights. The trial court entered a permanent parenting plan giving him one five-day visit each month plus additional time at holidays. Nieswandt appeals, arguing that the plan was not supported by substantial evidence and that the trial court erred by: (1) relying on evidence outside the record; (2) awarding Fernando attorney fees; and (3) reducing his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ditmar v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Mahoney v. ShinpochWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Boyles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Parentage of JMKWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brock v. KeplWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hazen v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. In Re Parentage of JHCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. In Re T.c.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API