Legal Opinion
Carney v. Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 30, 2001No. Civ.A 99CV10630-RCLPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
LINDSAY, District Judge.
Introduction and Procedural History
This case has been brought as a class action on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased securities of Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc. (“Cambridge” or “CTP”) between November 25, 1998 and March 18, 1999. 1 The three lead plaintiffs are W.R. Carney, James R. Thompson, and Ishiug J. Wu. The essence of the plaintiffs’ claim is that the defendants, CTP and two of its officers, issued false or misleading statements during the Class Period in order to inflate artificially the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Alan Aulson Et Ux. Maureen Aulson v. Charles BlanchardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mesko v. Cabletron System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Access Cardiosystems, Inc. v. Fincke (In Re Access Cardiosystems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Orton v. Parametric Technology Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- In Re Stone & Webster, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- City of Bristol Pension Fund v. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.