Schwartz v. Armour Fertilizer Works
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
Is the mailing of a notice to redeem to an owner at the address shown by the records of the Receiver of Taxes sufficient to cut off the owner’s right of redemption under the Nassau County Administrative Code, notwithstanding that the notice is returned undelivered? The court holds that it is not and that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment must, therefore, be denied.
The transfer from the tax lien purchaser to plaintiff herein having been made solely for the purpose of this action, plaintiff’s rights are no greater than those of the purchaser. The moving papers disclose that a search was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- State ex rel. Cronkhite v. BeldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Jackson, ex rel, Watson v. EstyNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Hendershot v. FerkelOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Glenn v. HolubDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schwartz v. Armour Fertilizer WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962