Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Town of Island Falls v. AKR INC.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 23, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddall, J.

On Report. This is a real action brought by the Inhabitants of Island Falls to determine title to an undivided five-sixteenths interest in and to some fifty-six lots or parts of lots of wild land situated in the plaintiff township. Defendant filed a plea of general issue with brief statement that plaintiff’s title was invalid and ineffectual. The case was referred to a single justice under the old rules of court. Objections to the acceptance of the referee’s re port were not acted upon by the presiding justice, and the-case was reported by agreement to this court. We considerthat the case is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webber v. Barker Lumber Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
  2. Hornblower v. BantonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  3. Penobscot Development Co. v. ScottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Hamilton v. Village of McCallIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bachus v. West Traverse TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Yourik v. MalloneeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Bachus v. West Traverse TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API