Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 2008No. A07A1649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Paul Reynolds appeals from his aggravated battery conviction and contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel’s failure to: (1) request a charge on a lesser included offense, (2) object to alleged improper closing argument by the prosecuting attorney, and (3) request a recharge on self-defense. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

“A trial court’s finding that a defendant has not been denied effective assistance of trial counsel will be affirmed unless clearly erroneous.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Scapin v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Lajara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Scapin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API