Legal Opinion

Scapin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1992No. A92A1022PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Scapin appeals her conviction of the offenses of failure to maintain lane and driving under the influence of alcohol. The sole enumeration of error contends the trial court erred in failing to grant defendant’s motion for new trial and motion to set aside verdict because of ineffective assistance of counsel. Held:

“Georgia has adopted the two part test for effectiveness set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 (104 SC 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984). [Cit.] Under the Strickland formula, defendants seeking to show that their counsel was ineffective must…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pitts v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Warren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Brogdon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pardo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Duvall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Paige v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API