Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Seiki Miyashiro

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1968No. 4703PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Robert M. Botts, is an attorney originally retained by Alicia Carroll, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, to prosecute her claim for damages predicated upon injuries she suffered in a collision of a taxi, in which she was a passenger, with another automobile. The retainer was under a written agreement providing for a contingent fee of one-third of any amount recovered and payment of costs by plaintiff.

Acting on the retainer agreement, appellant, as plaintiff’s attorney, filed in the circuit court a complaint against the operators of the taxi and the other automobile, and also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evans v. OckershausenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Wilkinson v. TildenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
  3. Keating v. KeatingHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bernstein v. SuchoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Booker v. Midpac Lumber Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Booker v. Midpac Lumber Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Hoddick, Reinwald, O'Connor & Marrack v. LotsofHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. LessaryHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re Hawaii General Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API