Legal Opinion
Hark'n Technologies v. Orange Whip Fitness X
District Court, D. Utah
Decided April 7, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00054Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION HARK’N TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Utah MEMORANDUM DECISION AND corporation, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART [117] Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Case No. 1:21-cv-00054-CMR ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC, et al., Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Defendants. Before the court is Defendants Orange Whip Fitness X, LLC (Orange Whip), Douglas J. Wald (Wald), and Brian J. Newman’s (Newman) (collectively, Defendants) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Motion) (ECF 117) regarding…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Bones v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Yurman Design, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Paj, Inc., Doing Business as Prime Art & Jewel, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.