Legal Opinion

United States v. Sinkfield

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 19, 1980No. Crim. A. CR79-223APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SHOOB, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on convicted defendant Michael Sinkfield’s motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. “Although Rule 35 does not require the sentencing judge to justify a proper order reducing a sentence, district judges occasionally do so.” Annotation, Reduction of Sentences Imposed by Federal District Court under Rule 35 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 32 A.L.R.Fed. 914, 934 (1977). Because this motion presents a question on which there appears to be no reported case law, this Court wishes to set forth its intentions in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. GlasgowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  4. Irizzary v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
  5. United States v. Edward Farish Cumbie, and Willard CumbieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Doyle James Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API