Legal Opinion

Miners Savings Bank v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1939No. Appeal, 252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

The action is assumpsit to recover on an indemnity bond losses sustained by plaintiff bank as a result of defalcations of one of its employees. The bond indemnified plaintiff against loss due to “a dishonest or criminal act” on the part of its officers or employees. The losses claimed were discovered in April of 1931 and covered a period from October 8,1930, to March 31,1931.

The claim is resisted by defendant on the ground that on May 21, 1930, Sharkey, the defaulter, had misappropriated $950 of the bank’s funds, and that plaintiff’s officers had knowledge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erie Trust Co. Bank v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. of London, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Universal Credit Co. v. United States Guarantee Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alfalfa Electric Coop., Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973
  2. First Nat'l Bk. v. USF & G. CO.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. First National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Commercial Banking Corp. v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Northeast Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API