Legal Opinion

Hiles v. Johnson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Wood County. The case is suffieently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtObtobt, J.

These two cases are substantially alike in respect to the questions presented on appeal. The complaints *518are first in ejectment, with the usual averments, as against defendants claiming title to the premises, and it is averred “ that the defendants claim title to said lands, and an interest therein, and claim to be the owners thereof and the whole thereof; but this plaintiff insists that said claims of the defendants are unlawful, and their pretended title thereto is void and ought to be canceled of record.” Eollow-ing the usual prayer for judgment in ejectment is the following : “ And that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bassett v. WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Willard v. ReasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Lee v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Truesdell v. RhodesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Leidersdorf v. Second Ward Savings BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Mutual Fire Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. White v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Estate of MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Koepke v. WinterfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Chrestenson v. HarmsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API