Borysewicz v. Dineen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
This action of tort to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff and alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, a dentist practising in the city of Springfield, was tried to a jury. After a verdict for the plaintiff, the judge, upon leave reserved (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 231, § 120), and upon the defendant’s motion, *462ordered that a verdict be entered for the defendant. The plaintiff’s only exception is to the allowance of this motion.
The evidence, in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff, discloses that on June 7 or 8, 1933, the defendant, after administering gas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toy v. MackintoshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Ernen v.CrofwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Gabrunas v. MiniterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- King v. BelmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Sheehan v. StrongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berardi v. MenicksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Gahn v. LearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Langis v. DanforthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Ward v. LevyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Kiley v. DervinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.