Legal Opinion

Kiley v. Dervin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 4, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The consolidated bill of exceptions states that this is an action of tort to recover for injuries arising out of the alleged “negligent attendance and malpractice” on the part of the defendant’s intestate, a physician, hereinafter referred to as the defendant. The plaintiff’s exception is to the entry of a verdict for the defendant under leave reserved, and the defendant’s exceptions are to the refusal of the trial judge to grant certain requests for rulings which are pressed in the event that the plaintiff’s exception is sustained.

The jury could have found the following facts: The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Bouffard v. CanbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Halnan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Tallon v. SpellmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Shannon v. RamseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. OkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
  2. Haggerty v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Rosario v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
  4. Cocheco Aqueduct Ass'n v. Boston & Maine R. R.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  5. Haggerty v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API