Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jackson v. American Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1980No. 14363Published

1Dissent

MARVIN, Judge,

dissent from refusal to grant rehearing.

I respectfully dissent from this court’s refusal to grant a rehearing because the facts of this case, when analyzed in the proper perspective of the Louisiana statute and cases, support the conclusion of the trial court that this employee’s accidental drowning arose out of and occurred during the course of his employment. Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill and Lumber Company, 278 So.2d 5 (La.1973); Malone-Johnson, “Workmen’s Compensation”, 2d Ed., La.Civil Law Treatise, Vol. 13, § 149.

This court agreed with the factual findings by the trial court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Myers v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill and Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Campbell v. Baker, Culpepper & BrunsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Mitchell v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API