Guntley v. Staed
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge. The court erred in admitting evidence as to whether or not, when the American Brewing Company first began to sell goods to Strube, they were, or were not, informed of a supposed indebtedness by Strube to Louis Obert. It was admitted that the American Brewing Company (one of the beneficiaries) knew of an indebtedness at the time when the mortgage to them and others was executed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge. The court erred in admitting evidence as to whether or not, when the American Brewing Company first began to sell goods to Strube, they were, or were not, informed of a supposed indebtedness by Strube to Louis Obert. It was admitted that the American Brewing Company (one of the beneficiaries) knew of an indebtedness at the time when the mortgage to them and others was executed. Whether that beneficiary knew of that debt, or some other debt, years before that date, was utterly immaterial, and a false issue was raised…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
Louis Obert, one of the defendants, about July 1,1891, recovered a judgment against Louis Strube as principal and Peter Schick as indorser, on a promissory note for $250. From this judgment Strube and Schick appealed, giving an appeal bond, with Oscar C. Koehler as surety; this judgment on appeal was affirmed for $304.10; on November 23, 1891, *159Obert recovered another judgment in the circuit court against Louis Strube for $444.85; the judgment of $304.10 was paid by Oscar Koehler, the principal and interest of which was afterwards paid him by Schick, but not the cost. On November 24, 1891,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aull Savings Bank v. Aull's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Christian v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Berkson v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Garrett v. WagnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Neosho City Water Co. v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Snoqualmi Realty Co. v. MoynihanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Cady v. CoatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Herf & Frerichs Chemical Co. v. Lackawanna LineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Martin v. BarnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Caskey v. City of La BelleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.