Legal Opinion

State v. Bradley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 21, 1947No. 15917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OxNER, A. J.:

I am in accord with the conclusions of Mr. Chief Justice Baker that (1) the Court below had jurisdiction to try the offense alleged in the indictment and (2) that there was no error in refusing appellant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, but am unable to agree with the conclusion that a new trial should be granted on account of the admission of the testimony of Tom Cowan. I would overrule all exceptions and affirm the judgment below.

Evidently neither the officers nor the solicitor believed the statement of Cowan, made immediately after the liquor was found, that it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. HarmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barber v. . MingesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Barber v. . MingesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API