Legal Opinion

Burgess v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 3, 1992No. A92A0299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Ronald Burgess was indicted and convicted for selling and distributing a noncontrolled substance representing it to be a controlled substance and for attempting to elude a police officer and appeals. Evidence at trial was that Burgess sold a substance which he represented to be methamphetamine (“crank”) to an undercover agent. The substance was not methamphetamine, but was a mixture containing niacinamide, a vitamin, and a decongestant.

At trial, Burgess admitted that he sold the undercover agent the substance; his defense was entrapment. There was conflicting testimony as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Gilliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API