People v. Marshall
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.
Defendant appeals by leave granted a January 10, 1977, order denying his motion for a blood test and jury trial at county expense in a paternity action.
Defendant’s motion was phrased in constitutional terms. He asserted that he was entitled to a blood test and jury trial at county expense because he had shown indigency for purposes of obtaining appointed counsel1 and that denying an indigent the requested fee waivers violated the due process *94and equal protection clauses of the United States and Michigan Constitutions.
The trial court denied defendant’s motion on two grounds.2 First, the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Artibee v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. StoecklMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. AntkoviakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- B______ v. B______Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. VisinaizDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004
- Bowerman v. MacDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.