Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Birks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 1, 1958No. 37425PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
By this action, the plaintiff, E. G. Birks, sought to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile wreck. The original defendants were Ruth Ester Happel, Harold H. Happel and Patsy Ruth Rutledge, partners doing business as H. J. Happel Company, and C. R. Taylor. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff against the last named defendant only and he has appealed. The parties will be referred to in the same order in which they appeared in the trial court.
The controversy, in so far as it is here presented, grows out of an undisputed factual situation. Early…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lynn v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Franco v. VakaresArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Equels, Adm'x v. Tulsa City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Anderson v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Orthopedic Clinic v. HansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Holland v. Dolese Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Rader v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Carnes v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Taylor v. BirksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.