Legal Opinion

Schwartzberg v. Norotsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

In these actions for personal injuries and property damages plaintiffs move for summary judgment. It is uncontradicted that the car in which plaintiffs were passengers at the time of the accident was at a standstill at a red traffic light when it was struck in the rear by defendants’ vehicle. In self-exculpation defendants aver that without previous warning the foot brake on the car failed, that the emergency brake was applied but failed to stop the car timely.

By establishing that their car was at rest when struck in the rear plaintiffs have established a prima facie case of negligence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Bondar v. Ar Jay Paint Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schneider v. ElvinNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Marino v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API