Legal Opinion

McCorkle v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 7, 1970No. Civ. 70-158-KPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, asking this Court to declare that the gas screw yacht “Safari,” No. 507907, is not subject to a claim asserted by the defendant, The First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co., Philadelphia, a Pennsylvania corporation. 1

Plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil' Procedure. There is no factual dispute herein. Thus, the case is ripe for consideration under Rule 56.

Defendant asserts a claim to the “Safari” arising from a purchase money…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White's Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Stewart & Co. v. RivaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Foster v. Chamberlain & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  4. Atlantic Trust Co. v. The VigilanciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  5. Atlas Imperial Diesel Engine Co. v. CriscuoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. William R. McCorkle and Jeane D. McCorkle v. The First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  2. Velikopoljski v. Florida National Bank (In Re Velikopoljski)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API