Legal Opinion
Stewart & Co. v. Rivara
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 31, 1927No. 290PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
April 17, 1919, the company made a contract .to. sell Rivara a tugboat. The vessel had been documented By the company in the Custom House in New York as a vessel of the United States and was enrolled for coasting voyages between ports of the United States. It was operated in interstate and intrastate commerce. The purchase price was to be paid in installments, and title was not to pass until all was paid. When the contract was made, the buyer paid part and the seller delivered the tug to him. The contract provided that in case , of default the seller might take possession of the tug and that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Johnson v. Chicago & Pacific Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Martin v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mullane v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- William R. McCorkle and Jeane D. McCorkle v. The First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- The People v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- General Motors Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.