Legal Opinion
Nowland v. Shoe Corp. of America
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 23, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 3538PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAYTON, District Judge.
Invoking the diversity jurisdiction of this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, § 1391(a), plaintiffs Thomas L. Nowland and Irene P. Nowland, both Delawareans, brought suit to recover money damages from Whitelight Industries, Inc., (White-light) a corporation of a state other than Delaware, and Shoe Corporation of America, an Ohio corporation trading in Delaware as Wilmington Dry Goods Company.1 The gravamen of the plaintiffs’ suit was that they were injured and that they suffered damages when Mr. Now-land fell from a ladder which had been purchased at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Louis W. Silverii, Administrator of the Estate of Dominick J. Mash, Deceased v. Wilson Kramer and John W. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Hyman Reiver & Company v. MerlonghiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sheats v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Cabassa v. American Union Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972