Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Borst

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1951No. 12232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a. plea of privilege. We have decided that.-one of appellants’ points .requires a reversal;.of the order appealed from and the rendition of judgment sus- taming the plea of privilege. For this reason we shall not discuss other points contained in appellants’ brief; which if sustained would require a reversal -and remand only.

It appears that in October, 1949, the District Court of Duval County rendered judgment dissolving the marriage of Elizabeth Pugh and James Roy Pugh, Sr. Custody of their child, James Roy: Pugh, Jr., was awarded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodman v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Thacher Medicine Co. v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Yeagle v. BullCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. McKinney v. Texas Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calloway v. CallowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Gonzales v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Morrow v. Port Arthur Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Sebolt v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API