Legal Opinion

Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1942No. 10063PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Schlumberger Well Surveying Corporation, owner of Patents No. 1,819,923 and No. 1,913,293, which were issued to Conrad Schlumberger on Aug. 18, 1931, and June 6, 1933, on applications filed June 26, 1929, and Jan. 23, 1932, respectively, obtained a decree against Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company sustaining Claims 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the former patent and Claim 1 of the latter, adjudging infringement, and awarding an accounting. On this appeal therefrom, the validity of each patent is challenged for want of sufficient disclosure, because the new and useful part of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Katz v. Horni Signal Mfg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Newport Industries, Inc. v. Crosby Naval Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Vincent v. Suni-Citrus Products Co. Food Processes, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp. Dan B. Vincent, Inc. v. Minute Maid CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Jones v. BodanessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  5. General Steel Products Company v. LorenzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API