Legal Opinion
Jones v. Bodaness
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1951No. 4173PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant brought this suit for infringement of Letters Patent No. 2,279,691, for a new and improved apparatus for washing Venetian blinds or the like, referred to as the means patent; and Letters Patent No. 2,199,747, for an improved method for washing Venetian blinds, oh the like, by the use of the means patent. The latter will be referred to as the method patent.
Both patents are based upon the same drawings and specifications, which in general outline, disclose an undercut channel track suitably supported. A frame, designed to receive and enclose a Venetian blind,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- The Eimco Corporation v. Peterson Filters and Engineering Company and Komline-Sanderson Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Refrigerated Dispensers, Inc., Diamond Ice MacHine Company, and the Diamond CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Doran Coffee Roasting Co., Inc. v. Wyott Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.