Legal Opinion

Kresge v. Keystone Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1989No. 1115 and 1116PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

The issue presented in this appeal is whether 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1714 barred recovery of first party benefits, as a matter of law, by a party who claimed to no longer possess an inoperable, uninsured vehicle, which nonetheless remained registered in that party’s name in Pennsylvania at the time of the accident from which the benefits claim arose. We find that recovery was barred.

The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows. On January 10, 1987, Sandra Mae Kresge (“Kresge”) was seriously injured in an accident while riding as a passenger in an automobile insured by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Mowery v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. DeMichele v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Elder v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Henrich v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API