Desmond v. City of Charlotte
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Judge HUDSON,
dissenting.
I believe plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence of defendant’s negligence to allow the jury’s verdict to stand. Thus, I respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision that the trial court should have granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on that issue.
The majority finds that the sidewalk defect of which plaintiff complains was trivial as a matter of law and points to Watkins v. Raleigh, 214 N.C. 644, 200 S.E. 424 (1939), Joyce v. City of High Point, 30 N.C. App. 346, 226 S.E.2d 856 (1976), Bagwell v. Brevard, 256 N.C. 465, 124 S.E.2d 129 (1962), and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Smith v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Mosseller v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Willis v. City of New BernCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.