Legal Opinion

Mead v. Close

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 5, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The testatrix died November 26th, 1919, leaving a will executed September 26th, 1919. In the third paragraph she gave the residue of her estate to her sister for her life, with the privilege of using so much of the principal as might be necessary for her comfortable support and maintenance, the paragraph concluding: “Upon the death of my sister, Josephine Close, I direct that said rest, residue and remainder of my estate, or so much thereof as may be left, shall be equally divided among my brothers, or their children.” When the will was executed there were living two brothers of the testatrix…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mooney v. TollesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. White v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  3. Austin v. BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  4. Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. AckermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bronson v. PinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Howard v. BatchelderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. McFarland v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Connecticut Superior Court · 1973
  5. Smith v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API