Legal Opinion

Smith v. Town of Groton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.

The three plaintiffs, administrators of the estates of John M. Chapman, George H. Chapman and Walter E. Chapman, each claim an undivided one-fourth interest in property of the defendant upon which a junior high school is now located. The property was originally owned by one Robert Chapman, who died on March 11, 1889. The decedents whose estates are represented by the plaintiffs were sons of Robert Chapman. The plaintiffs claim as residuary devisees under the will of Robert Chapman. A life estate in all his property was given to his widow. After her death, the real estate here in question went…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McDonald v. DabneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Robinson v. ClappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Bartholomew v. MuzzySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  4. Johnson v. EdmondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  5. Dart v. DartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Varley v. VarleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. BirgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. In Re Estate of WagnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Keogh v. JannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Heath v. HeathConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API