Legal Opinion

People v. Silverberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 14, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Judgment of conviction rendered September 11, 2000 reversed, on the law, the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and the accusatory instrument is dismissed.

Defendant was convicted, after a nonjury trial, of witness tampering in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 215.10) and aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1]), in connection with a single telephone call that he made to the complainant, an attorney and long-time acquaintance. The defendant’s telephone call, made on February 16, 1998 and tape-recorded by the complainant,…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. WeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. . CasconeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. People v. ParrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. DelgadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CooperNassau County District Court · 2004
  2. People v. RodriguezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  3. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API