Legal Opinion

Garitee v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 30, 1880PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, J.

This is an action on the case brought by the appellant against the appellees to recover damages for an alleged special and particular injury suffered by the appellant from the acts of the appellees in filling up the Patapsco river in front of his, the appellant’s property bounding on said river, and thereby obstructing access to such property by wáter as formerly used and enjoyed.

There is little or no dispute in regard to the principal facts of the case. It is conceded that the appellant is, and has been since about the year 1868 or 1869, the owner of two several parcels of land fronting on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Casey's Lessee v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
  2. Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  4. Houck v. WachterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  5. Mayor of Cumberland v. MagruderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Davis v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Kirkwood v. Provident Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. People's Counsel v. Maryland Marine Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Lincoln v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API