Legal Opinion

Eggiman v. Mid-Century Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 1995No. 9304-02123; CA A81855PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiff Eggiman appeals from a summary judgment for defendant Mid-Century Insurance Co. on her action for breach of contract. She alleged that defendant breached its obligation under an insurance policy, which provided for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, by refusing to preauthorize physical rehabilitation treatment after she sustained injuries in an automobile accident. We affirm.

On November 3,1990, plaintiff suffered a soft tissue back injury in an automobile accident. At that time, she was insured under an automobile liability policy issued by defendant, which provided for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. McKenzie v. Pacific Health & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kenseth v. DEAN HEALTH PLAN, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brent MowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Oregon University System v. Oregon Public Employees UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Ous v. OpeuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Witt Co. v. RISO, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API