Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1982No. Crim. 21747PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

On August 3, 1977, defendant pleaded guilty before Judge Calcagno to possession of a completed check with intent to defraud (Pen. Code, § 475a). The plea was a negotiated one, entered upon condition that imposition of sentence would be suspended and that defendant would be placed on probation for 3 years with a maximum commitment of 160 days in county jail. The court thus retained some, albeit quite limited, discretion. On August 24, Judge Calcagno suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on probation for 3 years with the condition he serve 160 days in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. Ray O.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. DeJesusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. PedregonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. HsuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. LetteerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API