Grossman v. Hill
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
This is an action to quiet title under Pa. R. C. P. 1061, which supplanted the former practice in equity by bill quia timet. Plaintiffs, Bérnhárd H. Grossman and Ruth B. Grossman, Ms wife, are seeking to have property of which they are presently the equitable owners adjudged free of a restriction on alienation. To their complaint answers were filed by the defendants. Plaintiffs appeal from a refusal of the court below to grant their motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Fronting on the south side of Kinsman Road in the City of Pittsburgh are three lots…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pattin v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Bruker v. Carlisle BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Versailles Township Authority v. McKeesportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Brennan v. Shore Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sutton v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mather EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Siskos v. BritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Plauchak v. BolingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Reading Co. v. Willow Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.