Legal Opinion
People v. Allen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant was tried and convicted of grand larceny, among other things, in connection with his forging of a mortgage satisfaction which he then used to obtain a $1.7 million bank loan. "When the People announced their intention to call Matthew Dollinger — outside counsel for the bank’s title insurer — to testify at defendant’s trial, defense counsel informed the court and prosecutor that he and Dollinger represented each other in matters unrelated to defendant’s prosecution. The Assistant District Attorney…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. LombardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. PepeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. Ming LiNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. KnightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. BonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. WingateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.