Legal Opinion

People v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant is not entitled to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that his promised sentence ran concurrently with other sentences that were reduced as the result of defendant’s resentencing motion. He is also not entitled to a reduction of his sentence.

In the conspiracy case at issue on this appeal, defendant was sentenced, as promised, nunc pro tunc, to a sentence of 6 to 12 years to run concurrently with an aggregate term of 4V2 to 9 years imposed in 2006 for two convictions of third-degree criminal possession of a controlled substance. Thus, the conspiracy conviction effectively added…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PichardoNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. RowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. CagleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API