People v. Rowland
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
We held in People v Pichardo (1 NY3d 126 [2003]) that a defendant was entitled to withdraw his guilty plea where the plea had been induced by a promise that the defendant’s prison sentence would be concurrent with his sentence on a previous conviction and where, because the previous conviction was overturned, the promise could not be kept. In Pichardo, the earlier sentence was much the longer of the two, so that the promise of concurrent sentencing meant that the second *344sentence, entered on the plea, carried no additional jail time. In this case, we hold that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. PichardoNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KalinowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. OduAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. PuntervoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. CouserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.