Legal Opinion
United States v. Marquez
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 28, 2009No. Criminal Action 99-0043 (PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Jose Marquez’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. After a two-month-long trial in 2000, Mr. Marquez was convicted of conspiracy to distribute narcotics and acquitted of two other charges of possession with intent to distribute narcotics. Following his conviction, Mr. Marquez filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that his trial counsel was ineffective. The Court granted the motion on August 3, 2001, see United States v. Marquez, Opinion, Criminal No. 99-0043, Dkt. No.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Moore v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Marquez, JoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (PC) Garone v. MenciasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Linarez-Rodriguez v. HoneaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Starr v. MooreDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010