Legal Opinion

Blumenauer v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1992No. SC S38912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

Petitioner is an elector who is dissatisfied with a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative measure. ORS 250.085.1

Because our decision turns in part on procedural requirements of the initiative statutes, we first summarize the pertinent statutory provisions. ORS 250.045(1) permits a petitioner to file with the Secretary of State a “prospective [initiative] petition.” The Secretary of State, in turn, submits the prospective petition to the Attorney General. ORS 250.065(2). The Attorney General is required to prepare and return a “draft ballot title” within five…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kafoury v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ransom v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. McMurdo v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nichols v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API