Legal Opinion

United States v. Franklin Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 7, 2016No. 15-3086, 15-3107PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Appellants Franklin Thompson and Lamar Gibson appeal the District Court’s denial of their 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motions for sentence reduction. 1 Section 3582(c)(2) permits a district court to exercise its discretion to reduce a sentence only if: (1) the sentence is “based on” a Guidelines range that has subsequently been lowered; and (2) a sentence reduction would be consistent with the Sentencing Commission’s policy statements. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

The Sentencing Commission’s policy statement applicable here prohibits a district court from reducing a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Thomas KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Jamell BirtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Jose Martinez-OvalleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API