Legal Opinion

United Benefit Life Ins. Co. of Omaha v. Zwan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1940No. 14122PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Appellee, Zwan, obtained a life insurance policy from appellant, United Benefit Life Insurance Company, in the sum of $5,000, and on written application of the insured, *978the contract was enlarged by a “rider”, or supplemental contract, providing for benefits for total and permanent disability resulting from bodily injuries or disease. The contract entered into by the “rider” is:

“Benefits for Total and Permanent Disability.
“Insuring Clause — United Benefit Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called Company) hereby insures (subject to all the provisions and conditions hereinafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Travelers Ass'n v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Brown v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  3. International Travelers' Ass'n v. GuntherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. LenearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Hoyt v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1865

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Clements v. Connecticut General Life Insurance, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1973
  5. In re SmithCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API