Legal Opinion
United Benefit Life Ins. Co. of Omaha v. Zwan
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 11, 1940No. 14122PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Appellee, Zwan, obtained a life insurance policy from appellant, United Benefit Life Insurance Company, in the sum of $5,000, and on written application of the insured, *978the contract was enlarged by a “rider”, or supplemental contract, providing for benefits for total and permanent disability resulting from bodily injuries or disease. The contract entered into by the “rider” is:
“Benefits for Total and Permanent Disability.
“Insuring Clause — United Benefit Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called Company) hereby insures (subject to all the provisions and conditions hereinafter…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Travelers Ass'n v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Brown v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
- International Travelers' Ass'n v. GuntherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. LenearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Hoyt v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1865
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Clements v. Connecticut General Life Insurance, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1973
- In re SmithCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1984