Legal Opinion

Pathak v. FedEx Trade Networks T & B Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 20, 2018No. Civil Action No. 16–cv–01357–MEHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge *1270Defendant FedEx Trade Networks T and B, Inc. ("FedEx") seeks summary judgment on all nine of Plaintiff Falgun Pathak's employment discrimination and retaliation claims. Because Mr. Pathak agreed to dismiss his seventh, eighth, and ninth causes of action, I will analyze whether summary judgment is proper as to his first six claims. I first find that Mr. Pathak timely exhausted his claims only as they relate to his termination and the failures to promote in May and June 2014. I then hold that Mr. Pathak demonstrates triable issues of fact…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API