Legal Opinion
Daynard v. NESS, MOTLEY, LOADHOLT, RICHARDSON
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 18, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-10099-WGYPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
284 F.Supp.2d 204 (2003)
Richard A. DAYNARD, Plaintiff,
v.
NESS, MOTLEY, LOADHOLT, RICHARDSON & POOLE, P.A.; Ronald Motley; Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent, P.A.; and Richard F. Scruggs, Defendant-Plaintiffs,
v.
Castano Plaintiffs Legal Committee a/k/a Castano Group; William Baggett; Baggett, McCall & Burgess; Jack M. Bailey, Jr.; Law Offices of Jack M. Bailey, Jr.; Scott Baldwin; Baldwin, Baldwin & Baldwin; Daniel E. Becnel; Landry & Becnel; Raul Bencomo; Bencomo, Bencomo & Associates; Terry P. Bottinelli Hertin, Burstein, Sheridan, et. al.; Martis Ann Brachtl; Goodkind, Labaton, Rudoff &…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kim v. VeglasDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009