Legal Opinion · Dissent

Council on Developmental Disabilities, Inc. v. Cabinet for Health & Family Services

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2015No. 2013-SC-000357-DGPublished

1DissentCunningham, J.

The majority today holds that the Council on Developmental Disabilities, Inc. (the “Council”) is not exempt fi-om the Kentucky Adult Protection Act (“KAPA”) confidentiality provision as enumerated in Kentucky Revised Statute (“KRS”) 209.140. In formulating this conclusion, the majority finds that the Council is not a “social service agency” and has no “legitimate interest” in obtaining the requested records. For the following reasons, I respectfully dissent..

The Kentucky Open Records Act (“KORA”), KRS 61.871 et seq., provides that “[a]ll public records shall be open for inspection by any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Kentucky Board of Examiners of Psychologists v. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lawson v. Office of the Attorney GeneralKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kentucky New Era, Inc. v. City of HopkinsvilleKentucky Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API