Legal Opinion

Kent v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1949No. 6 Div. 800PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

The indictment in this case charges the offense of disposing of property on which there was a valid lien. Title 14, Sec. 363, Code 1940.

The property involved is one bale of cotton on which a landlord had a lien for rent. It is without dispute in the evidence that the cotton in question was raised on the rented farm.

The defendant testified that he carried the cotton to the gin, but never did see it or possess it in any manner after delivering it to the ginner to be baled. In other words, he denied that he sold or otherwise disposed of the property.

A warehouseman testified that on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Freeman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Bankhead v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Bringhurst v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flurry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Shiflett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. State v. WilbanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API