Bankhead v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
For the admitted killing of Wheeler Thompson, the appellant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree. The accused claimed self defense.
In the state of the proof it was clearly for the jury to determine whether or not the defendant had a legal excuse to shoot the deceased.
The matter of a continuance of a cause in the lower court always addresses itself to the sound, enlightened discretion of the trial judge. Newman v. State, 30 Ala.App. 529, 9 So.2d 768. There was not an abuse of this privilege in denying the motion for a continuance because the appellant’s attorneys were…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- George v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- McDowell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Bluett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Stovall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Alexander v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Golden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Walker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.