Legal Opinion

Tudor Engineering Co. v. Mouw

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1985No. 15387PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

This action arises out of an unpaid bill for surveying services. On March 2, 1981, Tudor Engineering Company (Tudor), filed an action in small claims court seeking to recover $291.97 for professional land surveying services performed for John Mouw. Mouw had refused to pay the bill, asserting that the amount he was charged was excessive in light of the services rendered. Judgment was entered in favor of Tudor for the amount requested.

On May 21, 1981, Mouw filed a notice of appeal from the small claims judgment, posting a $75 cash bond and an undertaking on appeal of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Steinour v. Oakley State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Tom Nakamura, Inc. v. G. & G. PRODUCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Leon Phillips v. Roy JacobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Safaris Unlimited, LLC v. Von JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. VanGorp v. SieffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API