Legal Opinion

State v. Bell, 87727 (6-28-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 2007No. 87727PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Joaquin Bell ("appellant"), appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On September 22, 2004, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted appellant on seven counts, which included charges of rape, attempted rape, gross sexual imposition and kidnapping. All counts included sexually violent predator specifications and five of the counts included repeat violent offender specifications and notices of a prior conviction. Several of the counts also included sexual motivation specifications.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Schneider v. KreinerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State v. BatkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API