Legal Opinion

Gabriel Briguglio v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 2, 1982No. 81-2305PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Gabriel Briguglio, convicted of federal criminal charges in 1979, petitioned the district court for a new trial under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court denied Briguglio habeas corpus relief 1 without affording him an evidentiary hearing on his claims. Because we conclude that Briguglio was entitled to the hearing he requested, we will remand.

During the trial of the charges against Briguglio, Briguglio’s trial counsel (he has new counsel on appeal) was under investigation by the same United States Attorney’s Office that was prosecuting the case against Briguglio. Counsel…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Peter CancillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Gambino, Rosario, Erasmo Gambino, Antonio Gambino, and Anthony SpatolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Anthony Armienti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  5. United States Ex Rel. Sullivan v. CuylerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API